Presidential Debates

Selected Bibliography

Aaron, T. D. (1999). First Amendment Rights: Excluding political candidates from state-sponsored televised debates.Florida Law Review, 51, 975-984.

Abramowitz, A. I. (1978). The impact of a presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 680-690.

The American Presidency Project: Presidential Debates. 2016. [http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/debates.php]

Asard, E., & Gronbeck, B. E. (2000). Televised party leader and presidential candidate debates in Sweden and the United States. T. A. Hollihan (Ed.), Argument at century's end: Reflecting on the past and envisioning the future (pp. 394-402). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.

The aftermath of round three (1992, Oct. 24). Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 50, 3336. [provides #s on viewership]

Alexander, H. & Margolis, J. (1978). The making of the debates. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral and policy perspectives (pp. 18-32). New York: Praeger.

An C. & Pfau, M. (2004). The efficacy of inoculation in televised political debates. Journal of Communication, 54, 421-436.

Anderson, J. B. (1988). A proper institution: Guaranteeing televised presidential debates. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

Antonian, A. (2000). Government-owned broadcasters retain the right to control political candidates' First Amendment Right of access to sponsored debates. Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal, 10, 493-542.

Apker, J., & Voss. R. W. (1994). The student voter. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 187-202). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Atkin, C., Hocking, J., & McDermott, S. (1979). Home state voter response and secondary media coverage. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Auer, J. J. (1962). The counterfeit debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp.142-150). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Auer, J. J. (1981). Great myths about the great debates. Speaker and Gavel, 18,14-21.

Auer, J. J. (1986). Presidential debates: Public understanding and political institutionalization. Speaker and Gavel, 24,1-7.

Barmann, B. C. (1990). Third party candidate and presidential debates. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 441-466.

Barbaros, C. (2012). Exploring televised political debates: Strategies and issues. Argumentum: Journal of Argumentation Theory & Rhetoric, 10, 140-149. (Romania)

Barrow, L. (1961). Factors related to attention to the first Kennedy-Nixon debate. Journal of Broadcasting, 5, 229-238.

Barrow, R. L. (1977). Presidential debates of 1976: Toward a two party political system. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 46, 123-149.

Bartels, L. M. (1988). Presidential primaries and dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bates, S. (1993, February). The Future of Presidential Debates. http://www.annenberg.nwu.edu/pubs/debate/Battle of the sexes (1992, Sept-Oct). Psychology Today, 25, 13.

Bechtolt, W. E., Jr., Hilyard, J., & Bybee, C. R. (1977). Agenda control in the 1976 debates: A content analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 54, 674-681.

Beck, C. S. (1996). "I've got some points I'd like to make here": The achievement of social face through turn management during the 1992 Vice President debate. Political Communication, 13, 165-180.

Becker, L., Sobowale, I., Cobbey, R., & Eyal, C. H. (1978). Debates' effects on voters' understanding of candidates and issues. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, and M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspective (pp. 126-139). New York: Praeger.

Becker, L. B., Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., & McCombs, M. E. (1979). Influence on public agendas. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 418-428). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Becker, S., & Lower, E. (1962). Broadcasting in presidential campaigns. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 25-55).

Becker, S. L., Pepper, R., Wenner, L., & Kim, J. (1979). Information flow and the shaping of meaning. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 384-397). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Benoit, W. L. (2018). Issue ownership in the 2016 presidential debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 95-103.

Benoit, W. L. (2013). Candidates' personal qualities In political leaders' debates. Human Communication, 16, 87-94.

Benoit, W. L. (2013). Political election debates: Informing voters about policy and character. Lexington Books.

Benoit, W. L., (2007). Determinates of defense in presidential debates. Communication Research Reports, 24, 319-325.

Benoit, W. L. (2000, May). Let's put "debate" into presidential debates. Rostrum, 74, 21-24.

Benoit, W. L., & Arnie, D. (2005). A functional analysis of American vice presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 225-236.

Benoit, W. L., Blaney, J. R., & Pier, P. M. (1998). Debates: A free-for-all. In W. L Benoit, J. R. Blaney, & P. M. Pier (Eds.), Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending (pp. 57-74). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Benoit, W. L., & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 219-233.

Benoit, W. L., &, Bryan, J. M. (2014). A functional analysis of UK debates in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Western Journal of Communication, 78, 653-667.

Benoit, W. L., & Currie, H. (2001). Inaccuracies in media coverage of the 1996 and 2000 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 28-39.

Benoit, W. L., & Delbert, J. (2009). A functional analysis of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 46, 110-115.

Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2004). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation and vote choice. Human Communication Research, 30, 124-144.

Benoit, W. L, & Hansen, G. J. (2004). Issue ownership in primary and general presidential debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 40, 143-154.

Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2002). Issue adaptation of presidential television spots and debates to primary and general audiences. Communication Research Reports, 19, 138-145.

Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2001). Presidential debate questions and the public agenda. Communication Quarterly, 49, 130-141.

Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Stein, K. A. (2004). Newspaper coverage of presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40, 246-258.

Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Verser, R. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 70, 335-350.

Benoit, W. L., & Henson, J. R. (2009). A functional analysis of the 2008 Vice Presidential debate: Biden versus Palin. Argumentation and Advocacy, 46, 39-50.

Benoit, W. L., & Harthcock, A. (1999). Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 66, 341-357.

Benoit, W. L., & Henson, J. (2007). A functional analysis of the 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian elections. Argumentation & Advocacy, 44, 36-48

Benoit, W. L., & Henson, J. (2006). A functional analysis of non-presidential primary debates, Speaker & Gavel, 43, 22-35.

Benoit, W. L., & Klyukovski, A. A. (2006). A functional analysis of 2004 Ukrainian presidential debates. Argumentation, 20, 209-225.

Benoit, W. L., McHale, G. J., Pier, P. M., & McGuire, J. P. (2003). Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Effects of watching primary debates in the 2000 U.S. presidential campaign. Journal of Communication, 52, 316-331.

Benoit, W. L., McKinney, M. S., & Holbert, R. L. (2001). Beyond learning and persona: extending the scope of presidential debate effects. Communication Monographs, 68, 259-273.

Benoit, W. L., Pier, P. M., Brazeal, L. M., McHale, J. P., Klyukovksi, A., & Airne. D. (2002). The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Benoit, W. L., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Functional theory and political discourse: Televised debates in Israel and the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83, 281-297.

Benoit, W. L., Stein, K. A., Hansen, G. J. (2004). Newspaper coverage of presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 17-27.

Benoit, W. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2004). Effects of watching a presidential primary debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 25, 1-25.

Benoit, W. L., & Sudbrock, L. A. (2008). Functional analysis of the 2008 Saddleback Presidential Forum. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 29, 68-84.

Benoit, W. L., Webber, D. J., & Berman, J. (1998). Effects of presidential debate watching and ideology on attitudes and knowledge. Argumentation and Advocacy, 34, 163-172.

Benoit, W. L., & Wells, W. T. (1996). Candidate in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

Benton, C. & Pokorny, G. (1979). The presidential forums. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 68-82). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Ben-Porath, E. N. (2007). Question bias and violations of comparability in intraparty debates: Iowa and New Hampshire, 2004. Communication Quarterly, 55, 375-396.

Ben-Seev, S., & White, L. (1962). Effects and implications. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 331-337). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Beom, K., Carlin, D. B., & Silver, M. D. (2005). The world was watching—and talking: International perspectives on the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 243-264.

Berlin, L. N., & Prieto-Mendoza, A. (2014). Evidential embellishment in political debates during US campaigns. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11, 389-409.

Berquist, G. (1994). The 1976 Carter-Ford presidential debates. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (2nd Ed.) (pp. 29-44). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Berquist, G. F. (1960, September). The Kennedy-Humphrey debate: To talk sense or to talk politics. Today's Speech, 8, 2-3, 31.

Berquist, G. F., & Golden, J. (1981). Media rhetoric and the public perception of the 1980 presidential debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 67, 125-137.

Berryhill, B. (19998). Constitutional law - First Amendment - public broadcasters may exclude political candidates from debates as long as exclusion is reasonable and viewpoint-neutral. Mississippi Law Journal, 68, 391-404.

Best, S. J., & Hubbard, C. (1999). Maximizing "minimal effects": the impact of early primary season debates on voter preference. American Politics Quarterly, 27, 450-467.

Best, S. J., & Hubbard, C. (2000). The role of televised debates in the presidential nominating process. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House 2000: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 255-284). New York: Chatham House.

Bilmes, J. (2001). Tactics and styles in the 1992 vice presidential debate: Question placement. Research on Language and social interaction, 34, 151-181.

Bilmes, J. (1999). Questions, answers, and the organization of talk in the 1992 vice presidential debate: Fundamental considerations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 213-242.

Bippus, A. (2007). Factors predicting the perceived effectiveness of politicians' use of humor during a debate, //Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 20, 105–121.

Birdsell, D. (1994). What should debates be? Standards of public discourse. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigning and America's self-images (pp. 128-142). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Birdsell, D. S. (1991). Special issue: Presidential debating beyond the debate analogy. Argumentation and Advocacy, 27, 97-99.

Bishop, G., Meadow, R. G., & Jackson-Beeck, M. (Eds.) (1980). The Presidential Debates. New York, NY: Praeger.

Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R., & Tuchfarber, A. (1978). The presidential debates as a device for increasing the "rationality" of electoral behavior. In G. F. Bishop, R. Meadow, and M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 179-196). New York: Praeger.

Bishop, G. F., Oldendick, R., & Tuchfarber, A. (1978). Debate watching and the acquisition of political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 28, 99-113.

Bitzer, L., & Rueter, T. (1980). Carter vs Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Blankenship, J., Fine, M. G., & Davis, L. K. (1983). The 1980 Republican primary debates: The transformation of actor to scene. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 25-36.

Blankenship, J. (1990). Naming and name calling as acts of definition: Political Campaigns and the 1988 presidential debates. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 162-174). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Blais, A., & Perrella A. M. L. (2008). Systemic effects of televised candidates' debates. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 451-464.

Blenkinsopp, A. J. (2008) . Continuing the debate about presidential debates. Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, 103, 132-139.

Blume, K. (1985). The presidential election show: Campaign '84 and beyond on the nightly news. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey. [Chap. 4—Campaign on the nightly news: The debates, pp. 392-406.]

Beom, K., Carlin, D. B., & Silver, M. D. (2005). The world was watching—and talking: International perspectives on the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 243 - 264.

Borchers, T., & Miller, J. L. (2014). Bain & political capital in the 2012 GOP primary debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 574-590.

Bostdorff, D. M. (2009). Judgment, experience, and leadership: Candidate debates on the Iraq War I the 2008 presidential primaries. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 12, 223-277.

Bothwell, R. K., & Bringham, J. C. (1983). Selective evaluation and recall during the 1980 Reagan-Carter debate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 427-442.

Bowes, J. E. & Strentz, H. (1978). Candidate images: Stereotyping and the 1976 debates. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2 (pp. 392-406). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Boydstun, A. E., Glazier, R. A., & Pietryka, M.T. (2013). Playing to the crowd: Agenda control in Presidential Debates. Political Communication, 30, 254-277.

Brubaker, J., & Hanson, G. (2009). The effect of Fox News and CNN's postdebate commentator analysis on viewers' perceptions of presidential candidate performance. Southern Communication Journal, 74, 339-351.

Brydon, S. R. (1985). The two faces of Jimmy Carter: The transformation of a presidential debater, 1976 and 1980. Central States Speech Journal, 36, 138-151.

Bryski, B. G. (1978). An analysis of evidence from first Ford-Carter debate. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 6, 19-30.

Bucy, E. P., & Gong, Z. H., (2015). Image bite analysis of presidential debates. in Exploring the C-SPAN Archives: Advancing the research agenda (pp. 45-75). Browning: X. Robert, Ed., Purdue University Press.

Bush, Clinton, Perot meet in second and third debate (1992, Oct.22). Facts on File, 52, 787-789.

Caddell, P. H. (1981). Memorandum II: Debate Strategy, Oct. 21, 1980. In E. Drew. Portrait of an election: The 1980 presidential campaign (pp. 410-439). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

Cantrell, W. R. (1977). The impact of the 1976 presidential debate on a student population. Unpublished manuscript, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.

Carlin, D. B. (2005). DebateWatch: Creating a public sphere for the unheard voices. In M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, Bystrom, D. G., & Carlin, D. B. (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 223-234). New York: Peter Lang.

Carlin, D. B. (2000). Watching the debates: A guide for viewers. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 157-177). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Carlin, D. P. (1999).Constructing the 1996 debates: Determining the settings, formats, and participants. In L. L. Kaid and Bystrom, D. G. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 133-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Carlin, D. P. (1994). Implications for future debate. In D. P. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 205-215). New York: Praeger.

Carlin, D. P. (1994). A rationale for a focus group study. In D. P. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 3-19). New York: Praeger.

Carlin, D. P. (1992). Presidential debates as focal points for campaign arguments. Political Communication, 9, 251-265.

Carlin, D. P. (1989). A defense of the "debate" in presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 208-213.

Carlin, D. P. (2003). Across the ages: Views of the 2000 debates from college freshmen to senior citizens. In L. L Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 229-241). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Carlin, D. P., & Bicak, P. J. (1993). Toward a theory of vice presidential debate purposes: An analysis of the 1992 vice presidential debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 119-130.

Carlin, D. P., Howard, C., Stanfield, S, & Reynolds, L. (1991) The effects of presidential debate formats on clash: A comparative analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy, 27, 126-136.

Carlin, D. P., & McKinney, M. S. (Eds) (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Carlin, D. P., Morris, E., & Smith, S. (2001). The influence of format and questions on candidates' argument choices in the 2000 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2196-2218.

Carlin, D. B., Schill, D. Levasseur, D. G., & King, A. S. (2005). The post -9/11 public sphere: Citizen talk about the 2004 presidential debates. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 8, 617-638.

Carter, R. F., & Stamm, K. R. (1994). The 1992 presidential campaign and debates: A cognitive view. Communication Research, 21, 380-395.

Carter, R. (1978). A very peculiar horse race. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.). The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp.3-17). New York: Praeger.

Carter, R. (1962). Some effects of the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates (pp. 253-270). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Cater, D. (1962). Notes from backstage. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 127-131). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Cienki, A. J. (2004). Bush's and Gore's language and gestures in the 2000 US presidential debates: A test case for two models of metaphors. Journal of Language & Politics, 3, 409-440.

Chadwick, A., O’Loughlin, B., Vaccari, C. (2017). Why people dual screen political debates and why it matters for Democratic Engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 220-239. (UK)

Chaffee, S. H. (1978). Presidential debates - are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs, 45, 330-346.

Chaffee, S. H. (1979). Approaches of U.S. Scholars to the study of televised political debates. Political Communication Review, 4, 119-33.

Chaffee, S., & Choe, S. (1980). Time of decision and media use during the Ford-Carter campaign. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 53-69.

Chaffee, S., & Dennis, J. (1979). Presidential debates: An empirical assessment. In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 75-106). Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Chemerinsky, E. (1984). Changing the rules of the game: The new FCC regulations on political debates. Comm/Ent, 7, 1-18.

Cheney, R. (1979). The 1976 presidential debates: A Republican perspective. In A. Ranney (Ed.) The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 107-136). Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Cho, J. (2009). Disentangling media effects from debate effects: The presentation mode of televised debates and viewer decision making. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86, 383-400.

Cho, J., & Ha, Y. (2012). On the communicative underpinnings of campaign effects: Presidential debates, citizen communication, and polarization in evaluations of candidates. Political Communication, 29, 184-204.

Cho, J., & Choy, S. P. (201). From podium to living room: Elite debates as an emotional catalyst for citizen communicative engagements. Communication Research
38,
778–804.

Cho, J., Shah, D. V., Nah, S., & Brossard, D. (2009). "Split Screens" and "Spin Rooms": Debate modality, post-debate coverage, and the new vidomalaise. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 242-261.

Clayman, S. E. (1995). Defining moments, presidential debates, and the dynamics of quotability. Journal of Communication, 45, 118-157.

Clayman, S. E. (1992). Caveat orator: Audience disaffiliation in the 1988 presidential debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 78, 33-60. (Audience responses to WFU Debate)

Clevenger, T., Parson, D., & Polisky, J. (1962). The problem of textual accuracy. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 341-347). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Cohen, R. (1979). The public agenda foundation: An experiment in issues analysis. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 54-67). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Coleman, S. (Ed.) (2000), Televised election debates: International perspectives. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Coleman, S. (2000). Meaningful political debates in the age of the soundbite. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 1-24). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Coleman. S., & Moss, G. (2016). Rethinking election debates: What citizens are entitled to expect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21, 3-24.
24

Commission on Presidential Debates (1993). Review of the 1992 presidential debates. Washington, DC.: Freedom Forum. [transcript of proceedings]

Como, J. (1992). debates, 'debates,' and showbiz, National Review, 44, 37-.

Condit, C. M. (1989). Feminized power and adversarial advocacy: Leveling arguments or analyzing them? Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 226-230.

Conrad, C. (1993). Political debates as televisual form. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 62-76. [Hunt/Helms]

Conran, L. M. (1999). Odd Man out: Political debates and the First Amendment after Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 43, 1419-1448.

Cornfield, M. (2017). Empowering the party-crasher: Donald J. Trump, the First 2016 GOP Presidential Debate, and the Twitter marketplace for political campaigns. Journal of Political Marketing, 16, 212-243.

Corrado, A. (Ed.) (1995). Let American decide: The Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Forces on presidential debates. Twentieth Century Fund.

Cos, G. C., & Castaneda Rossmann, L. (1997). Articulating civic virtue in the second 1996 presidential debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 40. 1023-1132.

Crawford, C. B. (1999). Analysis of humor in the 1992 presidential debates. Perception and Motor Skills, 88, 417-420.

Dailey, W. O., Hinck, E. A., & Hinck. S. S. (2007). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debaters from 1960 to 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Dailey, W. O., Hinck, E. A., & Hinck. S. S. (2005). Audience perceptions of politeness and advocacy skills in the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 196-210.

Dale, J. (2000). Televised political debates and Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes: Excluding the public from public broadcasting. Pepperdine Law Review, 27, 629-656.

Darr, C. R. (2011). Adam Ferguson's Civil Society and the rhetorical functions of (In)civility in United States Senate debate. Communication Quarterly,
59
, 603-624.

Dauber, C. (1989). Debate as empowerment. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 205-207.

Davis, C. J., Bowers, J. S., & Memon, A. (2011). Social influence in televised election debates: A potential distortion of democracy. PLoS ONE, 6, e18154.

Davis, D. K. (1979). Influence on vote decision. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 331-347). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Davis, D., & Kraus, S. (1982). Public communication and televised presidential debates. In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 289-303). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Davis, J. W. (1997). Primary debates. U. S. presidential primaries and the caucus-convention system: A sourcebook (146-156)., Westport, CT: Praeger.

Davis, L. K. (1978). Camera-eye contact by the candidates in the presidential debates of 1976. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 431-437, 455.

Davis, M. H. (1982). Voting intentions and the 1980 Carter-Reagan debate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 481-492.

Debate Score: Kennedy up, Nixon down (1960, Nov. 7). Broadcasting, 27-28.

deBock, H. (1978). The influence of the Ford-Carter debates on the Dutch television audience. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 583-585.

Decker, W. D. (1992). The 1988 Quayle-Bentsen vice presidential debate. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (2nd ed.) (pp. 167-185). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Depoe, S. P., and Short-Thompson, C. (1994). Let the people speak: The emergence of public space in the Richmond presidential debate. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992: Presidential debates in focus (pp. 85-98). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Delli Carpini, M. X., Holsworth, R. D., Keeter, S., & Thalhimer, M. (1993). "Consumer journalism" in the electronic age: Instant reaction to the "people's" presidential debate, Media Studies Journal, , 47-.

Democratic Party presidential candidates participate in Brown and Black presidential Debate. Federal Document Clearing House, Political Transcripts, 102101607918. (Des Moines, IA, Jan. 17, 2000) Bradley/Gore.

Dennis, J., Chaffee, S., & Choe, S. (1979). Impact upon partisan: Image and issue voting. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 314-330). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

De Silva, I., & Herbeck, D. (1998). Journalists, moderators and citizens: A quantitative assessment of questions asked in presidential debates. In J. F. Klumpp (Ed.), Argument in a time of change: Definitions, frameworks, and critiques (pp. 232-237). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.

Desmond, R. & Donohue, T. (1981). The role of the 1976 televised presidential debates in the political socialization of adolescents. Communication Quarterly, 29, 302-308.

Desutschmann, P. (1962). Viewing, conversation, and voting intentions. In S. Kraus (Ed.), //The great debates: Background, perspective, effects //(pp. 232-252). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Devlin, L. P. (1994). ‘The 1992 Gore-Quayle-Stockdale Vice-Presidentidebate,’’ in Robert V. Friedenberg, Ed. Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates—2nd ed. Praeger, (223-).

Diakopoulos, N. A., & Shamma, D. A. (2010, April). Characterizing debate performance via aggregated Twitter sentiment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1195–1198). New York, NY: ACM.

Diamond, E., & Friery, K. (1987). Media coverage of presidential debates. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.) Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. 43-51). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly

Dinock, A. (2015). The structure of the pivot: Distrubing arguments through stargegic questions avoidance in presidential debate. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 161-167). Routledge, New York. .

Doerfel, M. L., & Marsh, P. S. (2003). Candidate-issue positioning in the context of presidential debates. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 212-237.

Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (1991). Voter learning in the 1988 presidential election: Did the debates and the media matter. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 27-38.

Druckman, J. N. (2003). The power of television images: The first Kennedy-Nixon debate revisited. Journal of Politics, 65, 559-571.

Drucker, S. J., & Hunhold, J. P. (1987). The debating game. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 202-207.

Edelsky, C., & Adams, K. (1990). Creating inequality: Breaking the rules in debates. Journal of Langauge and Social Psychology, 9, 1

Edwards, J. L. (2012). Visual literacy and visual politics: Photojournalism and the 2004 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 60, 681-697.

Elmer, G. (2013). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15(1), 18-30.

Eisner, K. D. (1993). Non-major-party candidates and televised presidential debates: The merits of legislative inclusion. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 141, 973-.

Elliot, W. R., & Sothirajah, J. (1993). Post-debate analysis and media reliance: Influences on candidate image and voting probabilities. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 321-335.

Ellsworth, J. T. (1965). Rationality and campaigning: A content analysis of the 1960 presidential campaign debates. Western Political Quarterly, 18, 794-802.

Eveland, W. P., McLeod, D. M., & Nathanson, A. I. (1994). Reporters vs. undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 42, 390-406.

Exline, R. V. (1985). Multichannel transmission of nonverbal behavior and the perception of powerful men: The presidential debates of 1976. In S. L. Ellyson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 183-206). : Springer-Verlag.

Fairlie, H. (1988, October 10). Brief whining moments. New Republic, 21-23.

Farah, G. (2004). No debate: How the republican and democratic parties secretly control the presidential debates. New York: Seven Stories Press.

Faucheux, R. (2003). Candidate debate inclusion: A way out of the morass? Campaigns and Elections 26.

Faucheux, R. (2003). The Debate Book: Standards and guidelines for sponsoring political candidate debaters in congressional, state and local elections. Campaigns and Elections Publishing.

Faucheux, R. A. (2002). What voters think about political debates: Key findings from a nationwide voter poll. Campaign and Elections, 23, 22-24, 26, 44.
Faucheux, R. (1996, Oct/Nov). Debate watcher's guide. Campaign & Elections, 280-32.

Fazio. R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.

Fein, S., Goethals, G. R., & Kugler, M. B. (2007), Social influence on political judgments: The case of presidential debates. Political Psychology 28, 165–192.

Feldman, L. & Price, V. (2008). Confusion or enlightenment? How exposure to disagreement Moderates the effects of political discussion and media use on candidate knowledge. Communication Research, 35, 61-87.

Firestone, C. M. (1987). Legal issues surrounding televised presidential debates. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.), Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. 17-26). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.

Fish, D. R. (1989). Image and issue in the second Bush-Dukakis debate: The mediating role of values. In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 151-157). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Fisher, W. R. (1980, May). Soap box derby: Political debates offer candidates the platform they want. USC Chronicle, 3.

Frana, A. W. (1989). Characteristics of effective argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 200-202.

Fouhy, E. M. (2005). Presidential debates help voters find the information they need, when they need it. In M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, Bystrom, D. G., & Carlin, D. B. (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 241-245). New York: Peter Lang.

Fouhy, E. M. (1992). The debates: A winning miniseries. Washington Journalism Review, 27-29.

Fredin, E. S., Kosicki, G. M., & Becker, L. B. (1996). Cognitive strategies for media use during a presidential campaign. Political Communication, 13, 23-42.

Freelon, D., & Karpf, D. (2015). Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. Communication & Society, 18, 390-406.

Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J, Gershon, S. A., Serignese, G. & Woodall, G. (2008). Spinning debates: The impact of the news media's coverage of the final 2004 Presidential debate. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 29–51.

Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., Gershon, S. A., Shafer, K., & Woodall G. S. (2007). Capturing the power of a campaign event: The 2004 presidential debate in Tempe. Journal of Politics, 69, 770–785.

Friendenberg, R. V. (2005). The 2004 presidential debates. In R. E. Denton (Ed.), The 2004 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 93-129). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub.

Friendenberg, R. V. (2002). The 2000 presidential debates. In R. E. Denton. The 2000 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 135-166). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1998). The 1996 presidential debates. In R. E. Denton (Ed.) The 1996 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 101-121). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1997). Patterns and Trends in national political debates: 1960-1996. In R. V. Friendenberg (ed.). Rhetorical studies of national political debates - 1996 (pp. 61-90). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friendenberg, R. V. (Ed.) (1997). Rhetorical studies on national political debates-1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1994). The 1992 presidential debates. In R. E. Denton (Ed.), The 1992 presidential campaign: A communication perspective (pp. 89-110). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.) (1990). Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1994). Patterns and trends in national political debates: 1960-1988. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992. (pp. 191-299). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.) (1990). Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1988. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1981). "Selfish interests," or the prerequisites for political debate: An analysis of the 1980 presidential debate and its implications for future campaigns. Journal of the American Forensics Association, 18, 91-98.

Friedenberg, R. V. (1979). "We are present here today for the purpose of having a joint discussion": The conditions requisite for political debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 16, 1-9.

Gadziala, S., & Becker, L. (1983). A new look at agenda-setting in the 1976 election debates. Journalism Quarterly, 60, 122-125.

Galasinski, D. (1998). Strategies of talking to each other: Rule breaking in Polish presidential debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17, 165-182.

Gallagher, R. (1998). Presidential debates. History of the Mass Media in the United States: An Encyclopedia. 527-528

Gallup, G., Jr. (1987). The impact of presidential debates on the vote and turnout. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.) Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. 34-42). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

Gauthier, G. (2004). The use of indirection in televised political debates: The Bush-Gore debates during the 2000 American presidential campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 3, 69-86.

Geer, J. (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electoral preferences for candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 486-501.

Gelders, D. (2000). The televised political debate, a gladiatorial contest in miniature: Relational control between debating politicians. Communication, 29, 3-1

Gentry, W. A., & Duke, M. P., (2009). A historical perspective on nonverbal communication in debates: Implications for elections and leadership,” Journal of Leadership Studies 2009, 2 36–47.

Germond, J. W., & Witcover, J. (1979). Presidential debates: An overview. In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 191-201). Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Gidengil. E., & Everitt, J. (1999). Metaphors and misrepresentation: Gendered mediation in news coverage of the 1993 Canadian leaders' debates. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 48-65.

Gilbert, R. E. (1982). Television debates and presidential elections: The United States and France. Journal of Social, Political and Economic Studies, 7, 411-429.

Gill, M. (1986). Presidential debates: Political tool or voter information? Speaker and Gavel, 24, 36-40.

Glantz, M., Benoit, W. L., & Airne, D. (2013). A functional analysis of 2012 presidential primary debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 49, 275-285.

Gong, Z. H., & Bucy, E. P. (2016). When style obscures substance: Visual attention to display appropriateness in the 2012 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 83, 349-372.

Gordon, A., & Miller, J. L. (2004). Values and persuasion during the first Bush-Gore Presidential debate. Political Communication, 21, 71-92.

Gottlieb, S. E. (1978). The role of Law in the broadcast of political debate. Federal Bar Journal, 37, 1-24.

Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W., Holbert, R. L., Winneg, K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). The changing nature of political debate consumption: Social Media, multitasking, and knowledge acquisition. Political Communication, 34, 172-199.

Gottfried, J. A., Hardy, B. W. Winneg K. M., & Jamieson, K. H. (2014). All knowledge is not created equal: Knowledge effects and the 2012 presidential debates. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 44, 389–409.

Gottschalk, L. A., Uliana, R., & Gilbert, R. (1988). Presidential candidates and cognitive impairment measured from behavior in campaign debates. Public Administration Review, 48, 613-619.

Graber, D. (1978). Problems of measuring audience effects in the 1976 debates. In R. Meadow, M. Jackson-Beeck, & G. Bishop (Eds.). The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 105-125). New York: Praeger.

Graber, D. A., & Kim, Y. Y. (1978). Why John Q. Voter did not learn much from the 1976 presidential debates. In B. D. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 2 (pp. 407-421). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Grebelsky-Lichtman, T. (2015) The role of verbal and nonverbal behavior in televised political debates. Journal of Political Marketing, 15, 362-387. [Isreal]

Gregory, S, Green, B., Carothers, R., Dagan, K., & Webster, S. (2001). Spectral analysis of candidates' nonverbal vocal communication: Predicting U.S. presidential election outcome. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 298-315.

Greene, R. J., (1965, April). The Kennedy-Keating “Debate”, Today's Speech, 13, 12-12, 42.

Gruner, C. R. (1997). A rejoinder to Levasseur and Dean on the "the Dole humor myth". Southern Journal of Communication, 62, 153-157.

Guelzo, A. C (2010). The little men behind the curtain: The committees, connectors, and carpenters who made the Lincoln-Douglas Debates happen. Argumentation & Advocacy, 46, 130-139.

Hagner, P., & Rieselbach, L. (1978). The impact of the 1970 presidential debates: Conversion or reinforcement? In R. Meadow, M. Jackson-Beeck, & G. Bishop (Eds.). The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 157-178). New York: Praeger.

Hahn, D. F. (1994). The 1992 Clinton-Bush-Perot presidential debate. In R. V. Friendenberg (Ed.) Rhetorical studies of National political debates, 1960-1992, 2nd ed. (pp. 187-210). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hahn, K. S., Lee, H., Ha, S., Jang, S., & Lee, J. (2018). The influence of “Social Viewing” on televised debate viewers’ Political Judgment. Political Communication, 35, 287-305. (Korea)

Hall, J. (2000). Mission to engage. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 178-202). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Halmari, H. (2008). On the language of the Clinton-Dole presidential campaign debates: General tendencies and successful strategies. Journal of Language & Politics, 7 247-270.

Hansen, G. J., & Benoit, W. L. (2002). Presidential television advertising and the public agenda, 1952-2000. Communication Studies,

Hansen, G. J., & Benoit, W. L. (2001). The role of significant policy issues in the 2000 presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2082-2100.

Hardy-Short, D. (1986). An insider's view of the constraints affecting Geraldine Ferraro's preparation for the 1984 presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel, 24, 8-22.

Hart, R. P., & Jarvis, S. E. (1997). Political debate: Forms, styles, and media. American Behavioral Scientist, 40. 1095-1122.

Hawkins, R., Pingree, S., Smith, K., & Bechtolt, W., Jr. (1976). Adolescents' responses to the issues and images of the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 368-383). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hawthorne, J., Houston, J. B., & McKinney, M. S. (2013). Live-tweeting a presidential primary debate: Exploring new political conversations. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 552–562.

Hellweg, S., & Phillips, S. (1981). A verbal and visual analysis of the 1980 Houston Republican presidential primary debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 47, 23-38.

Hellweg, S., & Phillips, S. (1981). Form and substance: A comparative analysis of five formats used in the 1980 presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel, 18, 67-76.

Hellweg, S. A., Pfau, M., & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

Herbeck, D. A. (2002). Punchless Debating. The Boston College Chronicle, 11, .

Herbeck, D. A. (1994). Presidential debate as political ritual: Clinton vs. Bush vs. Perot. In S. A. Smith (Ed.), Bill Clinton on stump, state, and stage: The Rhetorical road to the White House (pp. 249-272). Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press.

Hickman, R. H. (1984/85). Presidential election debates: Do they matter? Election Politics, 2, 10-14.

Hicks, D., & Greene, R. W. (2015). Managed convictions: Debate and the limits of electoral politics. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101, 98-112.

Hiland, A. (2015). Polysemic argument: Mitt Romney in the 2012 primary debates. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 168-173.). Routledge, New York.

Hillier, P. M. (2015). Rethinking media and technology: What the Kennedy-Nixon Debate myth can really teach us. Online Journal of Communication & Media Technologies, 5, 143-156.

Hillygus, D. S., & Jackman, S. (2003). Voter decision making in election 2000: Campaign effects, partisan activation, and the Clinton legacy. American Journal of Political Science. 47, 583-.

Hinck, E. A. (1993). Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Hinck, E. A., & Hinck, S. S. (2002). Politeness strategies in the 1992 vice presidential and presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 234-250.

Hinck, E.A., Hinck, S. S., & Dailey, W. O. (2012). Politeness in the 2001 presidential debates: Some preliminary finding from Iowa debates. Spectra, 48, 20-23.

Hinck, S. S., Hinck, R. S., Dailey, W. O., & Hinck, E. A. (2013). Thou Shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican: Politenessness theory in the 2012 Republican primary Debates. Argumentation and Adovocacy, 49, 259-274.

Hinck, E.A., Hinck, S. S., & Dailey, W. O. (2007). Politeness and political debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.

Hinck, E.A., Hinck, S. S., Dailey, W. O., Robert S. Hinck, R. S., Hansen, E., & Madsen, B. (2018). A tale of two parties: comparing the intensity of face threats in the democratic and republican primary debates of 2012 and 2016. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54, 104-121.

Hodgkinson, G., & Leland, C. M. (1999). Metaphors in the 1996 presidential debates: An analysis of themes. In L. L. Kaid and Bystrom, D. G. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 149-161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hogan, J. M. (1989). Media nihilism and the presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 220-225.

Holbert, R. L. (2005). Debate viewing as mediator and partisan reinforcement in the relationship between news use and vote choice. Journal of Communication, 55, 85-102.

Holbert, R. L., Benoit, W. L., Hansen, G. J., & Wen, W. (2002). The role of political ad recall, news use, political discussion, and debate viewing in campaign issue knowledge and salience. Communication Monographs, 69. 296-310.

Holbert, R. L. Benoit, W. L., & McKinney, M. S. (2002).The role of debate viewing in establishing "enlightened preference" in the 2000 presidential election. Seoul, Korea: ICA.

Holbert, R. L., Hansen, G. J., Caplan, S. E., & Mortensen, S. (2007). Presidential debate viewing and Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9-11: A study of affect-as-transfer and passionate reasoning. Media Psychology, 9, 673-694.

Holbert, R. L., LaMarre, H. L., & Landreville, K. D. (2009). Fanning the flames of a partisan divide: Debate viewing, vote choice, and perceptions of vote count accuracy. review. Communication Research, 36, 155-177.

Holbrook, T. M. (1999). Political learnings from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21, 67-89.

Holbrook, T. M. (1997). The effects of electoral debates on public 0pinion and voting behavior, Revista Romana de Sociologie, 8, 407-410.

Holbrook, T. M. (1996). Do campaigns matter? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (see chap. 5 "The effect of debates").

Holbrook, T. M. (1994). The behavioral consequences of vice-presidential debates: Does the undercard have any punch? American Politics Quarterly, 22, 469-482.

Houston, J. B., McKinney, M, S., Hawthorne, J., & Spialek, M. L. (2013). Frequency of tweeting during presidential debates: Effect on debate attitudes and knowledge. Communication Studies, 64, 548-560.

Houston, J. B., Hawthorne, J., Spialek, M. L., Greenwood, M., & McKinney, M. S. (2013). Tweeting during presidential debates: Effect on candidate evaluations and debate attitudes. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 301-311.

Howard, E. (1995). Debating PBS: Public Broadcasting and the power to exclude political candidates from televised debates. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 435-456.

Hull, E. B. (2004). Independent candidates' battle against the exclusionary practices of the Commission on Presidential Debates. Iowa Law Review, 90, 313-345.

Hullett, C. R., Louden, A. D., & Mitra, A. (2003). Emotion and political cognition: A test of bipolar, two-dimensional, and discrete models of emotion in predicting involvement and learning. Communication Monograph, 70, 250-263.

Hwang, H., Kim, Y., & Huh, C (2014). Seeing is believing: Effects of uncivil online debate on political polarization and expectations of deliberation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 621-633.

Hwang, H., Gotlieb, M. R., & Nah, S., & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Applying a cognitive-processing model to presidential debate effects: Postdebate news analysis and primed reflection. Journal of Communication; 57, 40-59.

Isotalus, P. (2011). Analyzing presidential debates: Functional theory and Finnish political communication culture. NORDICOM Review, 32, 31-43.

Jackson, B. & Jamieson, K. H. (2004). Finding fact in political debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 229-237.

Jackson-Beeck, M., & Meadow, R. G. (1979). Content analysis of televised communication events: The presidential debates. Communication Research, 6, 321-344.

Jackson-Beeck, M., & Meadow, R. (1979). The triple agenda of presidential debates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 173-180.

Jacques, W. W., & Ratzan, S. C. (1997). The Internet's world wide web and political accountability: New media coverage of the 1996 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1226-1237.

Jacques, W., Meilinger, F., Balmoris, M., Gernes, C., & Denby, S. (1993). Some aspects of major newspaper coverage of the 1992 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 37, 252-256.

Jacoby, J., Troutman, T., & Whittler, T. (1986). Viewer miscomprehension of the 1980 presidential debate—a research note. Political Psychology, 7, 297-308.

Jamieson, K. H. (2015). The discipline's debate contributions: Then, now, and next. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101, 85-97.

Jamieson, K. H. (1987). Television, presidential campaigns, and debates. In J. Swerdlow (Ed.) Presidential debate 1988 and beyond (pp. 27-33). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.

Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz, C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Jamieson, K., & Birdsell, .. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jarman, J. W. (2016). Motivated reasoning and viewers' reactions to the First 2012 Presidential Debate. Speaker and Gavel, 53, 83-101.

Jarman, J. W. (2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49.229-242.

Jeffres, L, & Hur, K. (1979). Impact of ethnic issues on ethnic voters. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debate: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 437-445). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Johnson, D. I. (2005). Feminine style in presidential debate discourse, 1960-2000. Communication Quarterly, 53, 3-.

Johnson, D. I. (2010). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debates from 1960 to 2004. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40, 569-570.

Jorgensen, C, Kock, C., & Rorbech, L. (1998). Rhetoric that shifts votes: An exploratory study of persuasion in issue-oriented public debates. Political Communication, 15, 283-299. [Denmark]

Kaid, L. L. (2003). Effects of political information in the 2000 presidential campaign: Comparing traditional television and internet exposure. American Behavioral scientist, 46, 677-691.

Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic Dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc. [Chapter 4: "Debate messages" pp. 67-87; Chapter 7: "News coverage of the debates" pp. 135-149]

Kane, T. (1987). The Dewey-Stassen primary debate of 1948: An examination of format for presidential debates. In J. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practice (pp. 249-253). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Khang, H. (2008). A cross-cultural perspective on videostyles of presidential debates in the US and Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 18, 47-63.

Karayn, J. (1979). Presidential debates: A plan for the future. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 209-219). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Karayn, J. (1992). The challenge of presidential debates. Television Quarterly, 25, 103-110.

Katz, E., & Feldman, J. J. (1962). The debates in the light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 173-223). Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

Kay, J., & Borchers, T. A. (1994). "Children in a sandbox": Reaction to the vice presidential debate. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 99-108). New York: Praeger.

Kelley, S. (1962). Campaign debates: Some facts and issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 351-366.

Kendall, K. E. (1997). The 1996 Clinton-Dole presidential debate: Through media eyes. In R. V. Friendenberg (ed.). Rhetorical studies of national political debates - 1996 (pp. 1-29). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kendall, K. (1997). Presidential debate through media eyes. American Behavioral Scientist, 40. 1193-1207.

Kennamer, J. D. (1987). Debate viewing and debate discussion as predictors of campaign cognition. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 114-119.

Kenski, K. & Jamieson, K. H. (2011). Presidential and Vice Presidential debates in 2008: A profile of audience composition. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 307-324.

Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2005). Who watches presidential debates? A comparative analysis of presidential debate viewing in 2000 and 2004. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 213-228.

Kephart, J. M. (2006). Argumentation and democracy: Towards a model of deliberative debate. In P. Riley (Ed.) Engaging Argument (pp.).0-385) . Washington, DC: National Communication Association. [2004 LA Dem Pres Primary Debate]

Khisu, B., Carlin, D. B., & Silver, M. D. (2005). The world was watching—And talking: International perspectives on the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 243-264.

Kinstler, L. (2012) Serving democracy, or America, abroad? World Policy Journal. 29, 37-. [exporting the Commission on Presidential Debate]

Kirk, P. (1995). Interview, Presidential debates and democracy, C-SPAN, October 28, 1995

Kirk, R., & Shill, D. (2011). A digital agora: Citizen participation in the 2008 Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 569-570.

Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1979). Presidential candidate debates: What can we learn from 1960? In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 1-55). Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Klumpp, J. F. (1989). W[h]ither civic discourse[?]! In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 147-150). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Kraus, S. (2000). Televised presidential debates and public policy (2nd Ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kraus, S. (1996). Winners of the first 1960 televised presidential debate between Kennedy and Nixon. Journal of Communication, 46, 78-96.

Kraus, S. (1987). Voters win. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 214-216.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1979). The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. [Note: Kraus' books include several research articles on debates]

Kraus, S. (1979). Presidential debates: Political option or public decree? In S. Kraus (Ed.), (pp.3-10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.The great debaters: Carter vs. Ford, 1976

Kraus, S. (1979). Candidate briefings. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 105-108). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Kraus, S. (1964). Presidential debates in 1964. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50, 19-23.Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1962). The great debates. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Kraus, S., & Davis, D. (1981). Political debates. In D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 273-296). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kraus, S., & Davis, D. (1982). Political debates: The negotiated format. Gamut: A Journal of Ideas and Information, 5, 102-112.

Kraus, S., & Smith, R. (1962). Images and issues. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 289-312). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Krauss, K. M., Apple, W., Morency, N., Wenzel, C., & Winton, W. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgment of another's affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312-320.

Krivonos. P. D. (1976). The first debate: Ford versus Carter-A behavioral criticism. Exetasis, 3, 3-9.

Kuhn, M. S. (1994). The presidential debate as source of citizen disagreement. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 139-153). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kunde, M. (2017). To watch or to read? The respective influence of televised political debates and media debate coverage on citizen learning. Communication Teacher, 31, 16-20.

Lamoureaux E. R., Entrekin, H. S., & McKinney, M. S. (1994). Debating the debates. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.). The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 55-67). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Landreville, K. D., White, C., & Allen, S. (2015). Tweets, polls, and quotes: Gatekeeping and bias in on-screen visuals during the final 2012 Presidential Debate. Communication Studies, 66. 146-164. visual other than the candidates)

Lang, G. E. (1987). Still seeking answers. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 211-214.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1984). Politics and television: Re-viewed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [Note: Chap. 4 - Ordeal before television: The Kennedy-Nixon debates, pp. 97-121, Debate and dilemmas: Carter versus Ford, pp. 177-196.]

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1979). Making the least of it? Television coverage of the audio gap. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 158-174). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1979). Immediate and mediated responses: Reaction to the first debate. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 298-313). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1978). The formation of public opinion: Direct and mediated effects of the first debate. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 61-80). New York: Praeger.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1978). The first debate and the coverage gap. Journal of Communication, 28, 93-98.

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1978). Immediate and delayed responses to a Carter-Ford debate: Assessing public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 322-341.

Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1977). Reactions of viewers. In S. Kraus (Ed.) The great debates: Carter versus Ford, 1976 (pp. 313-330). Bloomington: IN: Indiana University Press.

Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1961). Ordeal by debate: Viewer reactions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 277-288.

Lang, K., & Lang, G. E. (1962). Reactions of viewers. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 313-330). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lanoue, D. J. (1995). The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 448-450.

Lanoue, D. J. (1991). Debates that mattered: Voters' reaction to the 1984 Canadian leadership debates. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24, 51-65.

Lanoue, D. J. (1991). The 'Turning Point': Viewers' reactions to the second 1988 presidential debate. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 80-95.

Lanoue, D. J. (1992). One that made a difference: Cognitive consistency, political knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 168-184.

Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1991). The joint press conference: the history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. New York: Greenwood.

Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1989). The effects of primary season debates on public opinion. Political Behavior, 11, 289-306.

Lanoue, D. J., & Schrott, P. R. (1989). Voters' reactions to televised presidential debates: Measurement of the source and magnitude of opinion change. Political Psychology, 10, 275-285.

Lax, J. R. (1999). Fair division: A format for the debate on the format of debates. PS, Political Science & Politics, 32, 45-52.

League of Women Voters' Education Fund (1977). Effect of the debates on the 1976 campaign and election. Washington, D.C.: Author.

League of Women Voters' Education Fund (1981). The 1980 presidential debates: Behind the scenes. Washington, D. C.: Author.

Leff, M. C., & Mohrmann, G. P. (1974). Lincoln at Cooper Union: A rhetorical analysis of the text. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 346-358

Lehrer, J. (2011). Tension city: Inside the presidential debates from Kennedy-Nixon to Obama-McCain. Random House.

Lambert, J. B. (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 83-94.

Lemert, J. B., Elliot, W. R., Bernstein, J. M., Rosenberg, W. L., & Nestvold, K. J. (1991). News verdicts, the debates, and presidential campaigns. New York: Praeger.

Lemert, J. B., Elliott, W. R., Nestvold, J. J., & Rarick, G. R. (1983). Effects of viewing a presidential debate: An Experiment. Communication Research, 10, 155-173.

Lemert, J. B., Wanta, W., & Lee T. (1999). Winning by staying ahead: 1996 debate performance verdicts. In L. L. Kaid and Bystrom, D. G. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 179-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Leon, M. (1993). Revealing character and addressing voters' needs in the 1992 presidential debates: A content analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 88-105.

Leon, M., & Allen, T. H. (1990). Improving political campaign reporting: The use of precision journalism in the 1988 presidential debates. Mass Communication Review, , 14-21.

Lesher, S. (with Caddell, P., & Rafshoon, G.) (1979). Did the debates help Jimmy Carter? In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 137-154). Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Leuthold, D. A., & Valentine, D. C. (1981). How Reagan "won" the Cleveland debate: Audience predispositions and presidential debate "winners." Speaker and Gavel, 18, 60-66.

Levasseur, D. G., & Dean, K. W. (1997). Accounting for Dole's humor in the 1976 vice presidential debate: A response to Gruner's rejoinder. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 243-247.

Levasseur, D. G., & Dean, K. W. (1996). The Dole humor myth and the risks of recontextualizing rhetoric. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 56-72.

Levasseur, D., & Dean, K. W. (1996). The use of evidence in presidential debates: A study of evidence levels and types from 1960-1988. Argumentation and Advocacy, 32, 129-142.

Levi, L. (2001). Professionalism, oversight, and institution-balancing: The Supreme Court's "second best" plan for political debate on television, Yale Journal on Regulation, 18, 315-382.

Levine, K. J. (2001). Election 2000, the presidential debates, and Nader: Would participation have made a difference? American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2219-2231.

Louden, A. (2005). Research non-Presidential Debates: A moment in time. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 26, 41-50

Lowery, D. T., Bridges, J. A., & Barefield, P. A. (1990). The effects of network TV "instant analysis and querulous criticism" following the first Bush-Dukakis debate. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 814-825.

Lubell, S. (1962). Personalities vs. issues. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 151-162). Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Lucaties, J. L. (1989). Rhetorical legitimacy, <public trust> and the presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 231-238.

Lupfer, M. B., & Wald, K. D. (1979). An experimental study of the first Cater-Ford debate. Experimental Study of Politics, 7, 20-40.

Madsen, A. (1991). Partisan commentary and the first 1988 presidential debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 27,100-113.

Magarian, G. P. (1992). Fighting exclusion from televised presidential debates: Minor-party candidates' standing to challenge sponsoring organizations' tax-exempt status. Michigan Law Review, 90, 838-885.

Mahtesian, C. (2000, April). The debate over debates. Campaign and Elections, 21, 30, 32, 40, 60.

Maier, J., & Faas, T. (2003). The affTelevisedman voter: Televised debates, follow-up communication and candidates evaluations. Communications, 28, 383-404.

Majdik, Z. P., Kephart III, J. M., & Goodnight, G. T. (2008). The presidential debates of 2004: Contested moments in the democratic experiment. Controversia, 6, 13-38.

Marietta, M. (2009). The Absolutist advantage: Sacred rhetoric in contemporary presidential debate. Political Communication, 26, 388 - 411

Marshall, J. M. (2001, Jan/Feb). The debates: One-man band. Columbia Journalism Review, 39, 28-30. [Jim Lehrer]

Martel, M. (1981). Debate preparations in the Reagan camp: An insider's view. Speaker and Gavel, 18, 34-46.

Martel, M. (1983). Political campaign debates: Issues, strategies, and tactics. New York, NY: Longman.

Martel, M. (1984). Political campaign debates: Images strategies, and tactics. Campaigns and Elections, 4, 13-27.

Matera, F. R., & Salwen, M. B. (1996). Unwieldy questions: Circuitous answers? Journalists as panelists in presidential election debates. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 309-317.

Matsaganis, M., & Weingarten, C. (2001). The 2000 U.S. presidential debate versus the 2000 Greek Prime Minister debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2398-2409.

Mayer, M. A., & Carlin, D. B. (1994). Debates as an educational tool. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The 1992 presidential debate in focus (pp. 127-138). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Maynard, C. A. (1997). Manufacturing voter confidence: A video analysis of the American 1976 presidential and vice-presidential debates. Historical Journal of Film, Radio, and Television, 17, 523-563.

Mazo, E, Moos, M., Hoffman, H., & Wheeler, H. (1962). The great debates: An occasional paper on the role of the political process in the free society. Santa Barbara, CA: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.

McCall, J. M. (1984). The panelists as pseudo-debates: An evaluation of the questions and questioners in the presidential debates of 1980. Journal of the American Forensics Association, 21, 97-104.

McClain, T. B. (1989). Secondary school debate pedagogy. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 203-4.

McGookin, S. (2007, July 24). Debate format a small step for politics. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/2007/07/24/debate-youtube-politics-lead-cx_sm_0724debate.html

McIntosh, E. G. (2002). Policy shifts in the presidential debates. Psychological Reports, 90, 930-

McIntosh, E. G. (2002). Ratings of issues in presidential debates of 2000 by students. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 94, 264-?

McIntosh, E. G. (1993). Do presidential debates contribute to a change in voters' attitudes? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 545-?

McIntosh, E. G. (1989). Perceived bias in the presidential debates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 462-.

McKerns, J. P. (1993). Honest Rutherford Hayes nurtured “Good Press”: nineteenth P\president and the press. Media history digest, 13, 18-22.

McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Symposium on the presidential debates: An editorial note. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 195-196.

McKinney, M. S. (2018). Political campaign debates in the 2016 elections: advancing campaign debate scholarship. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 72-75.

McKinney, M. S. (2012). Debating democracy: The history and effects of U. S. presidential debates. Spectra, 48, 8-10.

McKinney, M. S. (2005). Engaging citizens through presidential debates: Does the format matter? in M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, D. G. Bystrom, & D. B. Carlin (Eds.). Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 209-221). New York: Peter Lang.

McKinney, M. S. (2005). Let the people speak: The public's agenda and presidential town hall debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 198-212.

McKinney, M. S. (1994). Design and implementation of the focus group study. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 21-35). Westport, CT: Praeger.

McKinney, M. S, & Banwart, M. C. (2005). Rocking the youth vote through debate: examining the effects of a citizen versus journalist controlled debate on civic engagement. Journalism Studies, 6, 153 - 163.

McKinney, M. S., & Carlin, D. B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

McKinney, M. ., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2007). Political engagement through debates: Young citizens' reactions to the 2004 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1169-1182.

McKinney, M. S., Dudash, E. A., & Hodgkinson, G. (2003). Viewer reactions to the 2000 presidential debates: Learning issues and image information. In L. L Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 43-58) . New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

McKinney, M. S., Houston, J. B., & Hawthorne, J. (2014). Social watching a 2012 Republican presidential primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 556-573.

McKinney, M. S., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2001). The front-runner, contenders, and also-rans: Effects of watching a 2000 Republican primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2232-2251.

McKinney, M. S., & Lamoureux, E. R. (1999). Citizen response to the 1996 presidential debates: Focusing on the focus group. In L. L. Kaid and Bystrom, D. G. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 163-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McKinney, M. S., & Rill, L. A. (2009). Not your parents' presidential debates: Examining the effects of the CNN/YouTube debates on young citizens' civic engagement. Communication Studies, 60, 392-406.

McKinney, M. S., Rill, L. A., & Watson, R. (2011). Who framed Sarah Palin? Viewer reactions to the 2008 Vice Presidential debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 212-231.

McKinney, M. S., Spiker, J. A., & Kaid, L. L. (1998). DebateWatch '96 and citizen engagement: Building democracy through citizen communication. In T. J. Johnson, C. E. Hayes, & S. P. Hayes (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate American democracy (pp.185-193). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

McKinnon, L. M., & Tedesco, J. C. (1999). The influence of medium and media commentary on presidential debate effects. In L. L. Kaid and Bystrom, D. G. (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 191-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McKinnon, L. M., Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (1993). The third 1992 presidential debate: Channel and commentary effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 106-118.

McLeod, J. M., Bybee, C. R., & Durall, J. A. (1979). Equivalence of informed participation: The 1976 presidential debates as a source of influence. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. deBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp.469-493). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

McLeod, J., Durall, J., Ziemke, D., & Bybee, C. (1979). Reactions of young and older voters: Expanding the context of effects. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 348-367). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

McNabb, N. D. (1994). Approaching great debates: An examination of format in the 1992 presidential debates. Unpublished master's thesis, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI.

Meadow, R. G. (1983). Televised campaign debates as whistle-stop speeches. In W. C. Adams (Ed.), Television coverage of the 1980 presidential campaign (pp. 89-102). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Meadow, R. G. (1987). A speech by any other name. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 207-210.

Meadow, R., & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1978). A comparative perspective on television debates: Issue evolution in 1960 and 1976. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, and M. Jackson-Beeck (Ed.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 33-58). New York: Praeger.

Meadow, R., & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1978). Issue evolution: A new perspective on presidential debates. Journal of Communication, 28, 84-92.

Mehtretter Drury, S. A. (2012). More than a beard and a pasty forehead: The lessons of the 1960 Great Debate. Spectra, 48, 12-15.

Mehtretter Drury, S. A., & Herbeck, D. A. (2016). Remembering and re-creating the Great Debates of 1960: Presidential Libraries as sites for political argumentation. Communication Quarterly, 64, 173-192.

Merritt, B. D. (1986). Jesse Jackson and television: Black image presentation and affect in the 1984 Democratic campaign debates. Journal of Black Studies, 16, 347-367.

Messaris, P., Eckman, B., & Grumpert, G. (1979). Editing structure in the televised versions of the 1976 presidential debates. Journal of Broadcasting, 23, 359-369.

Meyer, J., & Carlin, D. B. (1994). The impact of formats on voter reactions. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 69-83). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Middleton, R. (1962). National TV debates and presidential voting decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 426-429.

Milavsky, J. R., & Zhu, J-H.(1996) Equal time within televised presidential debates. In M. E. Stuckey (Ed.). The theory and practice of political communication research (pp. 93-121). Albany, NY: State University Press.

Milic, L. T. (1979). Grilling the pols: Q & A at the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford 1976. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Miller, A., & MacKuen, M. (1979). Learning about the candidates: The 1976 presidential debates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 326-346.

Miller, A., & MacKuen, M. (1979). Informing the electorate: Effects of the 1976 presidential debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 269-297). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Miller, J. L., & McKerrow, R. E. (2001). Political Argument and emotion: An analysis of 2000 presidential campaign discourse [looks at debates]. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 22, 43-58.

Mills, S. (1986). Rebuilding the presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel, 24, 41-51.

Minow, N. N., & Lamay, C. L. (2008). Inside the presidential debates: Their improbable past and promising future Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Minow, N. N., & Sloan, C. M. (1987). For great debates: A new plan for future presidential TV debates. A Twentieth Century Fund Paper. New York: Priority Press.

Minow, N. N., & Sloan, C. M. (1986). Putting on the candidates: The use of television in presidential elections. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 486, 146-157.

Minow, N. N., Sloan, C. M., & Angulo, C. T. (1999). Open salvos: Who should participate in presidential debates: A Century Foundation Report, New York. http://www.tcf.org/Publications/ElectionReform/openingsalvos.pdf

Mitchell, L. (1979). With the whole nation watching: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund task force on televised presidential debates. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Moore, D. W. (2008, October 7). It’s entertainment, not polling: Former Gallup pollster lampoons CNN’s ‘‘audience reaction meters’’ used in presidential debates. iMediaEthics. https://www.imediaethics.org/its-entertainment-not-polling/?new

Morano, M. (1996). Manipulating the voters from inside spin alley. Insight, 12, 13-14.

Morello, J. T. (2005). Questioning the questions: An examination of the "unpredictable" 2004 Bush-Kerry town hall debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 211-224.

Morello, J. T. (1992). The "look" and language of clash: Visual structuring of argument in the 1988 Bush-Dukakis debates. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 205-218.

Morello, J. T. (1991). "Who won?": A critical examination of newspaper editorials evaluating nationally televised presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 27, 114-125.

Morello, J. T. (1988). Argument and visual structuring in the 1984 Mondale-Reagan debates: The medium's influence on the perception of clash. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 52, 277-290.

Morello, J. T. (1988). Visual structuring of the 1976 and 1984 nationally televised presidential debates: Implications. Central States Speech Journal, 39, 233-243.

Morris, E. & Johnson, J. M. (2011). Strategic maneuvering in the 2008 Presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 284-306.

Morrow, G. R. (1977). Changes in perceptions of Ford and Carter following the first presidential debate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 33-45.

Mulder, R. (1978). The political effects of the Carter-Ford debate: An experimental analysis. Sociological Focus, 11, 33-45.

Munro, G. D., Ditto, P. H., Lockhart, L. K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M., & Peterson, E. (2002). Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: Evaluating the 1996 U.S. presidential debate. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 15-26.

Murphy, C. 2016. Report: Presidential Primary Debate Audiences. [https:www.ndn.org/blog/2016/05/report-presidential-primary-debate-audiences]

Murphy, J. M. (1992). Presidential debates and campaign rhetoric: Text within context. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 219-228.

Nagel, F., Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers' impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62, 833-850. (debates)

Nimmo, D., Mansfield, M., & Curry, J. (1978). Persistence and change in candidate images. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 140-156). New York: Praeger.

Nader, R., & Amato, T. (2001). So you want to run for president? Ha! Barriers to third-party entry. National Civic Review, 90, 163-172.

Norton, M. I., & Goethals, G. R. (2004). Spin (and pitch) doctors: Campaign strategies in televised political debates. Political Behavior, 26, 227-248.

O'Donnell, B. M (2012). An insiders' view of the presidential debates. Spectra, 48, 16-19.

Oft-Rose, N. (1989). The importance of ethos. Argumentation and Advocacy, 25, 197-199.

O'Grady, G. (2014). The use of key in projecting face-threatening acts in televised political debate (UK). Text & Talk, 34, 685-711.

O'Keefe, G., & Mendelshon, H. (1979). Media influences and their anticipation. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 405-417). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Oldenburg, C. (2015). Re“Characterizing” the anecdote: Synecdoche and ethotic argument in presidential debate rhetoric. Communication Studies, 66, 103–120.

Olson, K. M. (2015). Unqualified support: Joe Biden's disturbing performance of leadership, loyalty, and laughter in the 2012 vice presidential debate. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 219-224). Routledge, New York.

Olson, K. M. (2005). Analyzing televised political debates in the 2004 election cycle. Argumentation and Advocacy, 41, 191-195.

Owen, D. (1995). The debate challenge: Candidate strategies in the new media age. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problems (pp. 135-155) Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Owen, D. (1991). Media Messages in American presidential elections. Greenwood Press. (see chap 5, pp. 111-139).

Palmer, U. S. (1949). The western speeches of President Hayes. Western Speech, 13, 24-26.

Parker, W. W (1953). Rutherford B. Hayes as a student of speech at Kenyon College. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 39, 291-295.

Parry-Giles, T., & Parry-Giles, S. J. (2015) Expanding the discipline's debate contributions: New potentials, beyond effects, Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101,
113-126.

Parson, D. W. (1985). On the education of a TV debate critic. In J. R. Cox, M. O. Sillars, & G. B. Walker (Eds.), Argument and Social Practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 211-218). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Parson, D. W. (1989). Congregation by segregation: An analysis of argument strategies in the first 1988 presidential debate. In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 136-139). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Patterson, M. L., Churchill, M. E., Burger, G. K., & Powell, J. L. (1992). Verbal and nonverbal modality effects on impressions of political candidates: Analysis from the 1984 presidential debates. Communication Monographs, 59, 231-242.

Patterson, T. E. (2000). Election 2000: How citizens "see" a presidential debate. Boston: The Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy; John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

Payne, J. G. (2014). Crafting the mediated image: Political ads, debates, and issues in the 2012 U.S. presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 495-496.

Payne, J. G., Golden, J. L., Marlier, J., & Ratzan, S. C. (1989). Perceptions of the 1988 presidential and vice presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 425-435.

Parry-Giles, T., Parry-Giles, S. J. (2015). Expanding the discipline's debate contributions: New potentials, beyond effects. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 101, 113-126.

Perkins, S. J., & Smith, G. L. (1994). The gender gap? Male and female reactions to the 1992 presidential debate. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 175-186). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. (2012). One-in-ten "dual-screened" the presidential debate: TV trumps digital sources for debate coverage. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2012/10/11/one-in-ten-dual-screened-the-presidential-debate/.

Pfau, M. (2002). The subtle nature of presidential debate influence. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 251-261.

Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debate and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16, 99-112.

Pfau, M. (1987). The influence of intraparty political debates on candidate preference. Communication Research, 14, 687-697.

Pfau, M., & Eveland, W. P. (1994). Debates versus other communication sources: The pattern of information and influence. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 155-173). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Pfau, M., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (1996). Influence of traditional and non-traditional news media in the 1992 election campaign. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 214-232.

Pfau, M. & Kang, J. G. (1991). The impact of relational messages on candidate influence in televised political debates. Communication Studies, 42/2, 114-128.

Pickering, B. A., & Ril, L A. (2013). Democracy in Action: The Contribution of the DebateWatch Project to Civic Participation. Journal of Community Engagement and
Higher Education, 5,
3-14.

Pickering, B. A. (2015). Digital democratic voices: Intersecting student research, Twitter, and presidential debates. Communication Teacher, 29, 63-70.

Pingree, R. J., Scholl, R. M., & Quenette, A. M (2012). Effects of postdebate coverage on spontaneous policy reasoning. Journal of Communication, 62, 643-658.

Political debates (1998). Broadcasting & the Law, 27, 5-6. [FCC ruling exempting pol debates]

Polsby, N. E. (1979). Debatable thoughts on presidential debates. In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 175-186). Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Prentice, C. (2005). Third party candidates in political debates: Muted groups struggling to express themselves. Speaker and Gavel, 42, 1-12.

Prentice, D. B. (1987/88). Political debates and their application to the teaching of Lincoln-Douglas debate. The Forensics Educator, 2, 13-17.

The Presidential Debates: A Teacher's Guide (2002). The Commission on Presidential Debates in partnership with Kids Voting USA, http://debate.uvm.edu/dcpdf/cpd2000.pdf

Presidential debates: Hearing before the subcommittee on elections of the Committee on House Administration, House of Representative. June 17, 1993.

Presidential prime time (1988). Broadcasting the first Dukakis Bush debate. Broadcasting, 115, 8-.

Prior, M. (2012). Who watches presidential debates? Measurement problems in campaign effects research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(, 350-363.

Racine Group, The (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38, 199-218.

Ragsdale, G. (1997). The 1996 Gore-Kemp vice presidential debate. In R. V. Friendenberg (ed.). Rhetorical studies of national political debates - 1996 (pp. 31-60). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Ranney, A. (Ed.) (1979). The past and future of presidential debates. Washington, D. C.: American Enterprise Institute.

Jamin Raskin, J. (1999). The Debate Gerrymander, Texas Law Review, 77, 1943-.

Ray, R. F. (1961). Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1948. In R. Reid (Ed.), American public address: Studies in honor of Albert Craig Baird (pp. 245-270). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.

Reber, B. H., & Benoit, W. L. (2001). Presidential debate stories accentuate the negative. Newspaper Research Journal, 22, 30-43.

Reinemann, C., & Wilke, J. (2007). It's the debates, stupid! How the introduction of televised debates changed the portrayal of Chancellor candidates in the German press, 1949—2005. International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 92-111.

Reinemann, C., & Maurer, M. (2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and postdebate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication, 55, 775-794.

Reynolds, B. (1997). Who gets in? Media Studies Journal, 11, 54-59.

Rhea, D. M. (2012). There They Go Again: The use of humor in presidential debates 1060-2008. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 115-131.

Riley, P., & Hollihan, T. A. (1981). The 1980 presidential debates: A content analysis of the issues and arguments. Speaker and Gavel, 18, 47-59.

Ritter, K. W. (Special Ed.) (1981). Issue entitled: The presidential debates. Speaker & Gavel, 18,

Ritter, K., & Hellweg, S. A. (1986). Televised presidential primary debates: A new national forum for political debating. Journal of the American Forensics Association, 23, 1-14.

Ritter, K., & Henry, D. (1990). The 1980 Reagan-Carter presidential debate. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1988. (pp. 69-93). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Roberts, M. S., & Williams, A. P. (2003). Lockbox and fuzzy math: Associations of viewers' debate recall and partisan strength in the 2000 presidential campaign. In L. L Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 73-86). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Robinson, J. (1979). Poll results on the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 262-268). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Rose, D. D. (1979). Citizen uses of the Ford-Carter debates. Journal of Politics, 41, 214-221.

Rosenberg, W. L., & Elliot, W. R. (1987). Effect of debate exposure on evaluation of 1984 vice-presidential candidates. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 55-64,262+.

Rosenthal. P. I. (1963). Ethos in the presidential campaign of 1960: A study of the basic persuasive process of the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.

Rouner, D., & Perloff, R. M. (1988) Selective perception of outcome of the first 1984 presidential debate. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 141-147, 240.

Rowland, R. C. (2018). Implicit standards of public argument in presidential debates: what the 2016 debates reveal about public deliberation. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 76-94.

Rowland, R. (2013) The first 2012 Presidential campaign debate: The decline of reason in presidential debate. Communication Studies, 64, 528-547

Rowland, R. (1986). The substance of the 1980 Carter-Reagan debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51, 142-165.

Rowland, R., & Garcia, R. (1985). The Democratic debates: Does format make a difference. In J. R. Cox, M. O. Sillar, & G. B. Walker (Eds.), Argument and social practice: Proceedings of the fourth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Rowland, R., & Voss, C. (1987). A structural functional analysis of the assumptions behind presidential debates. In J. W. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 239-247).

Ruxandoiu, L. I. (2014).Strategic uses of certainty and uncertainty in a political debate. Language and Dialogue, 4, 149-162. (Romania)

Ryan, H. S. (1994). The 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (pp. 145-166). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Saks, J., Compton, J. L., Hopkins, A., & El Damanhoury, K. (2016). Dialed In: Continuous response measures in televised political debates and their effect on viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60, 231-247.

Salant, R. (1962). The television debates: A revolution that deserves a future. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 335-350.

Salant, R. (1979). The good but not great numbers: Some random personal notes. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 175-186). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Samovar, L. A. (1965). Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon debates: A rhetorical analysis. Western Speech, 29, 211-218.

Samovar, L. A. (1962). Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 48, 277-279.

Sarnoff. R. (1962). An NBC view. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: ground, perspective, effects (pp. 56-64). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Sauter, K. (1994). The 1976 Mondale-Dole vice presidential debate. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992. (pp. 45-68). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Sci, S. A., & Dewberry D. R. (2015). Something funny? The Laughing Joe Biden meme as digital topoi within political argumentation. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 232-237). Routledge, New York.

Scheufele, D. A.. Kim, E., & Brossard, D. (2007). How split-screen debate coverage influences evaluation of presidential debates. Communication Research, 34, 3-24.

Schiffer, A. J. (2017). Debates and partisan enthusiasm Before the 2012 Republican primaries. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 47, 293-310

Schmid, K H. (2000). Public broadcast stations' exclusion of candidates from debates: A step toward political independence? Communication Law and Policy, 1, 115-154.

Schram, S. F. (1991). The post-modern presidency and the grammar of electronic electioneering. [Benson-Quayle debate is the example]. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8, 210-216.

Schroeder, A. (2000). Media sponsorship of the 2000 primary debates. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5, 104-111.

Schroeder, A. (2008). Presidential Debates: Fifty years of High-risk TV. (2nd Ed). New York: Columbia University Press.

Schroeder, A. (2016). Presidential Debates: Fifty years of High-risk TV. (3rd Ed). New York: Columbia University Press.

Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential Debates: Forty years of High-Risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.

Schroeder, A. (2000, Oct. 13). Who wants to be a debater? Chronicle of Higher Education B13.

Schroeder, A. (1996). Watching between the lines: Presidential debate as television. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1, 57-75.

Schrott, P. R. and Lanoue, D. J. (2009). Debates are for losers. PS: Political Science and Politics 4 513–518.

Schrott, P. R. (1990). Electoral consequences of ‘winning’ televised campaign debates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 567-586.

Schrott, P. R., & Lanoue, D. J. (1992). How to win a televised debate. Candidate strategies and voter response in Germany, 1972-87. British Journal of Political Science, 22, 445-467.

Schudson, M. (2000). Image: The Kennedy-Nixon debates. Media Studies Journal, 14, 122-124.

Scott, R. L. (1981). You cannot not debate: The debate over the 1980 presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel, 18, 28-33.

Sears, D., & Chaffee, S. (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 223-261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Seiter, J. S. (1999). Does communicating nonverbal disagreement during an opponent's speech affect the credibility of the debater in the background? Psychology Reports, 84, 855-861.

Seiter, J. S. (2001). Silent derogation and perceptions of deceptiveness: Does communicating nonverbal disbelief during an opponent's speech affect perceptions of debater's veracity? Communication Research Reports, 7, 203-209.

Seiter, J. S., Kinzer, H. J., & Weger, H. (in press). Background Behavior in Live Debates: The effects of the implicit Ad Hominem fallacy. Communication Reports.

Seiter, J. S., Abraham, J. A., & Nakagama, B. T. (1998). Split-screen versus single-screen formats in televised debates: Does access to an opponent's nonverbal behaviors affect viewer's perception of a speaker's credibility? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 491-497.

Seiter, J. S., & Weger, H. Jr. (2005). Audience perceptions of candidates' appropriateness as a function of nonverbal behaviors displayed during televised political debates. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 225-235.

Self, J. W. (2007). Debating the 1976 debates: Establishing a tradition of negotiations. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 37, 331-348.

Self, J. W. (2005). The first debate over the debates: How Kennedy and Nixon negotiated the 1960 presidential debates. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35, 361-375.

Seltz, H., & Yoakam, R. (1962). Production diary of the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 73-126). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Seltz, H., & Yoakam, R. (1979). Production diary of the debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 110-157). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Senior, P. (2008). Electoral impact of televised leaders' debates on Australian Federal elections. Australian Journal of Political Science, 43, 443-.

Shapiro, W. (2012, October 3). Debate advice: Turn off Twitter. Columbia Journalism Review. https://archives.cjr.org/united_states_project/debate_advice_turn_off_twitter.php

Shaw, S. (2000). Language, gender and floor apportionment in political debates. Discourse & Society: An International Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in Their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts. 11, 401-18.

Sheckels, T. F., & Bell, L. C. (2003). Character versus competence: Evidence from the 2000 presidential debates and elections. In L. L Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.) The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 59-71) . New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Shields, S. A., & MacDowell, K. A. (1987). "Appropriate" emotions in politics: Judgments of a televised debate. Journal of Communication, 37, 78-89.

Schill, D., & Kirk, R. (2018). Meeting the commander-in-waiting: Undecided voters and the 2016 vice-presidential debate. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 139-158.

Schill, D., & Kirk, R. (2014). Courting the swing voter: “Real Time” insights into the 2008 and 2012 U.S. presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 536-555.

Short, B. (1986). A goals criteria approach: Preparing the public to evaluate presidential debates. Speaker and Gavel, 24, 23-35.

Bob Shrum, R., (2004). Debate Strategy and Effects. in Electing the President 2004: The Insider’s View, ed. K. H. Jamieson, University of Pennsylvania Press (119-).

Sigelman, L., & Sigelman, C. K. (1984). Judgments of the Carter-Reagan debate: The eyes of the beholders. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 624-628.

Simons, H., & Leibowitz, K. (1979). Shifts in candidate images. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 398-304). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Smith, C., & Voth, B. (2002). The role of humor in political argument: How "strategery" and "lockboxes" changed a political campaign. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 110-129.

Smith, C. A., & K. B. Smith (1994). The 1984 Reagan-Mondale presidential debates. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992. (pp. 95-119). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Smith, R. G. (1977). The Carter-Ford debates: Some perceptions from academe. Central States Speech Journal, 28, 250-257.

Spalding-Andreolle, D. (2001). From Whistle-Blowing to High-Powered Rhetoric: The Language of Mediation in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Debates. La-Revue-du-GERAS, 31-33: 189-202.

Spotts, S. E. (1992). The Presidential Debates Act of 1992. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 29, 561-580.

Stanton, F. (1962). A CBS view. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 65-72). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Steeper, F. (1978). Public response to Gerald Ford's statements on Eastern Europe in the second debate. In G. Bishop, R. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Ed.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 81-101). New York: Praeger.

Stepp, C. S. (1987). The role of journalists' questions in campaign forums. Political Communication and Persuasion, 4, 279-288.Stein, K. (2004) Points of Stasis in the 1960 and 2000 Presidential Debates. Speaker & Gavel, 41, 51-62.

Stewart, J. A. (2018), In through the out door: Examining the use of outsider appeals in presidential debates. Presidential Studies Quartery, 2-17

Stewart, P. A. (2016). Presidential laugh lines: Candidate display behavior and audience laughter in the 2008 primary debates. Politics and the Life Sciences, 29, 55-72.

Stewart, P. A. (2015). Polls and elections: Do the presidential primary debates matter? measuring candidate speaking time and audience response during the 2012 primaries. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 45, 361-381.

Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A.D., & Miller, J. (2016). "Please clap": Applause, laughter, and booing during the 2016 GOP presidential primary debates. //PS: Political Science & Politics, 49, 696-700.

Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., Dye, R. G., Eidelman, S., & , Wicks, R. H. (2017). Visual presentation style 2: Influences on perceptions of donald trump and hillary clinton
based on visual presentation style during the third 2016 presidential debate," American Behavioral Scientist, 61, 545-557.

Stewart. P. A., & Mosely, J. (2009). Politicians under the microscope: Eye blink rates during the first Bush-Kerry debate. White House Studies, 9, 373-388.

Streeck, J. (2008). Gesture in political communication: A case study of the Democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41, 154-186.

Stroud, N. J., Stephens, M., & Pye, D. (2011). The influence of debate viewing context on political cynicism and strategic interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist. 55, 270-283.

Sullivan, P. A. (1989). The 1984 vice-presidential debate: A case study of female and male framing in political campaigns. Communication Quarterly, 37, 329-343.

Swanson, L., & Swanson, D. (1978). The agenda-setting functions of the first Ford-Carter debate. Communication Monographs, 45, 347-353.

Swerdlow, J. L. (Ed.) (1987). Presidential debates 1988 and beyond. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly. Swerdlow, J. L. (1987).

The strange-and sometimes surprising history of presidential debates in America. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.), Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. —16). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.

Swerdlow, J. L. (1984). Beyond debate: A paper on televised presidential debates. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

Sypher, B. D. (1994). The focus group as a research tool. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 37-51). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Tannenbaum, P., Greenberg, B., & Silverman, F. (1962). Candidate images. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 271-288). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

The Joint Appearances of Senator John F. Kennedy and Vice President Richard M. Nixon: Presidential Campaign of 1960 (1961). Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.

Taofu, Z. & Lijuan C. (2013). Political “Horseracing” Show in media Era -An Analysis of the television debate in 2012 American presidential election from the perspective of political communication. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22, 78-85.

Thalhimer, M., & Federman, J. (n.d.). The debate pulse: Rapid response, interactive polling. http://www.museum.tv/debateweb/html/equalizer/print/essay_thalhimer.htm

Thorson, E., Hawthorne, J., Swasy, A., & McKinney, M. S. (2015). Co-viewing, tweeting, and Facebooking the 2012 presidential debates. Electronic News, 9, 195-214.

Tiemens, R. K. (1978). Televisions portrayal of the 1976 presidential debates: An analysis of visual content. Communication Monographs, 45, 362-370

Tiemens, R .K. (1989). The visual context of argument: An analysis of the September 25, 1988 presidential debate. In B. E. Gronbeck (Ed.), Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the sixth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 140-146). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

Tiemens, R. K., Hellweg, S. A., Kipper, P., Phillips, S. L. (1985). An integrative verbal and visual analysis of the Carter-Ford debate. Communication Quarterly, 33, 34-42.

Ţirlea, A-M. (2014). The role of the final debate in a campaign's strategy. Journal of Media Research, 7, 66-81.

Tonn, M. B. (1994). Flirting with Perot: Voter ambivalence about the third candidate. In D. B. Carlin and M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 109-123). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Tonn, M. (1993). The voters perspective. Review of the 1992 presidential debates, 4, May 1993. Commission on President Debates. Washington DC: Freedom Forum. 25-27.

Toth, S. F. (2013). The political duopoly: Antitrust applicability to political parties and the Commission on Presidential Debates. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 64, 239-278.

Trent, J. S. (1994). The 1984 Bush-Ferraro vice presidential debate. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (2nd Ed). (pp. 121-144). Westport, CT: Praeger. Trent, J. S.,

Trent, J. S., Schmisseur, A. M., & Gauder, G. E. (2000). Debate strategies then and now: A comparative analysis of two women candidates. T. A. Hollihan (Ed.), Argument at century's end: Reflecting on the past and envisioning the future (pp. 411-418). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association. [Ferraro & Dole]

Tschirhrhtoric (2015). Third party rhetoric and the constitution of an audience. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 238-243). Routledge, New York.

Tsfati, Y. (2003). Debating the debate: The impact of exposure to debate news coverage and its interaction with exposure to the actual debate. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 70-86.

Turcotte, J. (2015). The news norms and values of presidential debate Agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication & Society, 18, 239-258.

Valenzano III, J. M., & Edwards, J. A. (2012). The debate confessional: Newt Gingrich, John King and atoning for Past Sins. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 2, 30-38.

Vancil, D. L., & Pendell, S. D. (1987). The myth of viewer-listener disagreement in the first Kennedy-Nixon debate. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 16-27.

Vancil, D. L., & Pendell, S. D. (1984). Winning presidential debates: An analysis of criteria influencing audience response. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48, 62-74.

Vanocur, S. (2005). A presidential Debates retrospective. In M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, Bystrom, D. G., & Carlin, D. B. (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 235-239). New York: Peter Lang.

Visual priming and framing of the 2016 GOP and Democratic Party presidential primary debates (2018). Politics and the Life Sciences,

Wald, K., & Lupfer, M. (1978). The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 342-353.

Wall, V., Golden, J., & James, H. (1988). Perceptions of the 1984 presidential debates and a select 1988 presidential primary debate. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 18, 541-563.

Warner, B. R., Bramlett, J. C., Hoeun, S., Manik, D. I., & Bolton, J. P. (2018). Presidential primary debates compared: timing of debate and size of candidate field as moderators of debate effects. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 122-138.

Warner, B. R., & McKinney, M. S. (2013). To unite and divide: The polarizing effect of presidential debates. Communication Studies, 64, 508-527.

Warner, B. R., Bramlett, J.C., Hoeun, S., Manik, D. I, & Bolton, J. P. (2018). Presidential primary debates compared: timing of debate and size of candidate field as moderators of debate effects. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54, 122-138.

Warner, B. R., Carlin, D. B., Winfrey, K., Schnoebelen, J., & Trosanovski, M. (2011). Will the “real” candidates for president and vice president please stand up? 2008 pre- and post-debate viewer perceptions of candidate image. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 232-252.

Wrasse, J. W., Schill, D., & Kirk, R. (2018). Meeting the commander-in-waiting: Undecided voters and the 2016 vice-presidential debate. Argumentation & Advocacy, 54, 139-158.

Watching Debates; A Focus Group Analysis of Voters (2002). Campaigns and Elections. 27-.

Watts, M. (2002). Watching debates: A focus group analysis of voters. Campaign and Elections, 23, 27-28, 30, 32, 44.

Weaver, D., & Drew, D. (1995). Voter learning in the 1992 presidential election: Did the "nontraditional" media and debates matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 45-72.

Weaver, D., Drew, D., & Wu, W. (1998). Voter interest and participation in the 1996 presidential election: Did the debates matter? In T. J. Johnson, C. E. Hayes, & S. P. Hayes (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate American democracy (pp.87-95). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Weger Jr., H., Seiter, J. S., Jacobs, K. A., & Akbulut, V. (2010). Perceptions of debater effectiveness and appropriateness as a function of decreasingly polite strategies for responding to nonverbal disparagement in televised political debates. Argumentation & Advocacy, 47, 39-54.

Weiler, M. (1989). The 1988 electoral debates and debate theory. Argumentation and Advocacy: JAFA, 25, 214-219.

Weinberger, C. W. (1996, October 7). Presidential debates-or anchor debates? Forbes.

Weiss, R. O. (1981). The presidential debates in their political context: The issue-image interface in the 1980 campaign. Speaker and Gavel, 18, 22-27.

Wells, W. T. (2000). An analysis of attacking, acclaiming, and defending strategies in the 1976-1984 presidential debates. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Werling, D. S., Salvador, M., Sillars, M. O., & Vaughn, M. A. (1987). Presidential debates: Epidectic merger of images and issues in values. In J. W. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 229-238). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.

What voters think about political debates; Key findings from a nationwide voter poll (2002), Campaigns & Elections, 22-

Wicks, R. H. (2007). Does presentation style of presidential debates influence young voters' perceptions of candidates?" //American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1247-1254.

Wicks, R. H., Stewart, P. A., Eubanks, A. D., Eidelman, S., & Dye, R. G. (2017). Visual presentation style 1: A test of visual presentation styles and candidate evaluation
during the first 2016 presidential debate. American Behavioral Scientist,

Williams, D. E. (2001). Debate Watch 2000: Reflections of a moderator. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate: The Journal of the Cross Examination Debate Association, 22, 100-106.

Wills, G. (2010). Do the Lincoln-Douglas debates really matter? Argumentation & Advocacy, 46, 150-158.

Wilson, K. H. (2003). The racial politics of imitation in the Nineteenth Century. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 89-108.

Winkler, C. K., & Black, C. F. (1993). Assessing the 1992 presidential and vice presidential debates: The public rationale. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 77-87.

Winneg, K., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017). Learning From the 2016 U.S. general election presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 61, 362-378.

Winning the debate after the debate: Candidates supporters descend on the press, trying to put their man in the best light, ABC, NBC, CBS don't present them on their live broadcast. (1988) Broadcasting, 115, 27-.

Whitney, D. C., & Goldman, S. B. (1985). Media use and time of vote decision: A study of the 1980 presidential election. Communication Research, 12, 511-529.

Windt, T. O. (1994). The 1960 Kennedy-Nixon presidential debates. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates: 1960-1992 (2nd ed.). (pp. 1-27). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Yawn, M., & Beatty, B. (2000). Debate-induced opinion change: What matters?. American Politics Quarterly, 28, 270-285.

Yawn, M., Ellsworth, K., Beatty, B., & Kahn, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior, 20, 155-181. (live audience assessed)

Yoder, J., & Mims, H. (1979). The significance of written texts. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 449-452). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Youm, K. H. (200). Editorial rights of public broadcasting stations vs. access for minor political candidates to television debates. Federal Communications Law Journal, 52, 687-724

Zakahi, W. R. (2004). Presidential debates and candidate image formation: 1992, 1996, 2000. (pp. 151-175). In K. Hacker (Ed.), Presidential candidate images. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

Zakahi, W. R., & Hacker. K. L. (1995). Televised presidential debates and candidates images. In K. L. Hacker (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 99-122). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Zarefsky, D. (2015). What "went wrong" in the first Obama-Romney debate. In C. H. Palczewski, Ed., Disturbing argument (pp. 244-249). Routledge, New York.

Zarefsky, D. (1990). Lincoln, Douglas and slavery: In the crucible of public debate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Zarefsky, D. (1986). The Lincoln-Douglas debates revisited: The evolution of political argument. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 162-184.

Zeligson, W. S. (1994). Pool coverage, press access, and presidential debates: What's wrong with this picture? Cardozo Law Review, 1371-1399.

Zhu, J., Milavsky, J. R., & Biswas, R. (1994). Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate. Human Communication Research, 20, 302-333.

Zichermann, S. (2006). Bush's straight talk erases Kerry's scholarly chalk. The U.S. presidential debate of 2004: Who won the image war? Semiotica, 162, 323-339.

Ziegler, R., Friederike, A., & Diehl, M. (2007). Communication modality and biased processing: A study on the occasion of the German 2002 Election TV debate. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 2, 175-184.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License